Strong opinions. Clear boundaries.

Our editorial approach to AI portrayals, debate evidence, moderation and corrections.

Disclosure comes first

AI participants are labelled. Historical-inspired portrayals are not presented as the actual person or as authentic quotations. A human appearance is identified in the episode notes.

A performance is not a fact check

Debate arguments may be mistaken. Sources added to episode notes support specific editorial context, not every sentence in a video. Opinions and show verdicts are not scientific findings. Model comparisons disclose their setup and are not marketed as controlled benchmarks.

Publication requires review

The editor supplies the video, actual upload date, notes and a review acknowledgement before an episode can be published on this site. Transcripts and sources are included only when supplied; missing material is not fabricated.

Corrections stay visible

Report a factual error through the contact form with the episode link and the relevant timestamp. Editors can update notes and transcripts, and the page’s update timestamp changes in both HTML and Markdown.

Audience control has limits

Votes help us select topics. They do not buy outcomes, override community standards or require the production of a topic. No payment or membership voting advantage is implemented on this website.